What VCs Are Looking For Now: $25B+ Exits. The New “Decacorn”

The Goalposts Just Moved Again

If you have been in the ecosystem for more than a minute, you remember when the term unicorn actually meant something. It was the gold standard. Hitting a billion-dollar valuation was the signal that you had built something durable. Then, as capital flooded the market, we started talking about decacorns. Now, the math has shifted again, and it is a wake-up call for anyone building in the AI or crypto sectors.

A recent perspective shared by partners at Menlo Ventures highlights a stark reality: VCs are no longer just hunting for billion-dollar wins. They are hunting for $25 billion exits. The $2.3 billion valuation of a company like Owner.com, which is doing impressive work in vertical AI, is just the baseline now. To return the kind of capital modern growth funds have raised, they need outliers that dwarf the successes of the previous decade.

The Math of the Mega-Fund

To understand why the bar is so high, you have to look at fund sizes. When a venture firm raises a billion-dollar fund, a $1 billion exit doesn't actually do much for their limited partners. After the waterfall and the equity splits, that exit might only return a fraction of the total fund. To deliver the 3x or 5x returns that LPs expect, these firms need hits that are massive enough to cover all the failed bets and still generate billions in profit.

This is why we are seeing a pivot toward what some are calling the new decacorn. If there are 60+ companies currently valued or exited at over $25 billion, the VCs believe they can find the next one. For builders, this means the pressure to scale is no longer about hitting profitability; it is about proving you can dominate an entire category.

Vertical AI and the New Playbook

Vertical AI is currently the primary laboratory for this experiment. We are seeing companies move beyond general-purpose chatbots into deeply integrated solutions for specific industries—like the restaurant tech mentioned in recent growth reports. The thesis is simple: if you can own the entire operating system of a specific industry, you can reach that $25 billion stratosphere.

However, as a founder, you have to ask yourself if you want to play that game. Building a $25 billion company requires a specific kind of sacrifice. It means you are likely looking at a 10 to 15-year journey, massive dilution, and a constant need for aggressive growth. The middle ground—the $500 million exit that would change a founder's life forever—is increasingly viewed as a failure by the biggest players in Sand Hill Road.

What This Means for Builders

If you are raising capital right now, you need to be aware of this shift. You aren't just selling a product; you are selling a path to a $25 billion terminal value. If your market size doesn't support that math, you might find yourself struggling to attract growth-stage interest, even if your business is objectively healthy and profitable.

• TAM is everything: You cannot reach a $25 billion valuation in a $5 billion market. You have to prove that your AI or blockchain solution can capture a massive slice of a massive pie.
• Retention is the new growth: High-value exits are built on sticky revenue. If your churn is high, you will never survive the multiple rounds of funding required to reach these heights.
• Capital efficiency matters again: While VCs want huge exits, they are tired of burning billions to get there. The new winners are companies that scale with a semblance of sanity.

The Crypto and AI Intersection

In the crypto space, we see a similar phenomenon. Protocol valuations often skyrocket, but the actual value capture remains elusive. For a crypto project to reach the $25 billion mark and stay there, it has to move beyond speculation and into utility. We are seeing the same narrative in AI: the initial hype is fading, and the market is demanding to see which companies can actually build a moat.

The danger here is the "valuation trap." Founders who raise at massive valuations based on this new $25 billion exit expectation often find themselves stuck. If you raise at a $1 billion valuation but only grow to a $2 billion value, you are essentially a zombie in the eyes of your growth investors. You can't exit, and you can't raise more money easily.

The Reality Check

I tend to be skeptical when I hear VCs talk about these massive numbers. It feels like a way to justify the massive amounts of dry powder they need to deploy. But for a builder, ignoring this trend is dangerous. You need to know the motivations of the person sitting across the table from you. If they are looking for a $25 billion exit and you are looking to build a sustainable $100 million business, your interests are fundamentally misaligned.

The venture model is increasingly becoming a game of extremes. If you aren't an outlier, you're invisible.

We are entering an era where the "middle class" of startups is being squeezed out. You are either a massive, category-defining giant, or you are a bootstrapped, lean operation. The space in between is becoming a no-man's land.

Takeaway for Founders

Don't let the $25 billion number intimidate you, but don't ignore the math behind it either. If you want to raise from the top firms, you have to build for scale from day one. If you want control and a life outside of work, you might want to reconsider the venture path entirely. The goalposts have moved, and the game has become significantly harder. Make sure you're playing the version of the game that you actually want to win.

Read the original at SaaStr →