Loading prices…
STKR NewsSTKR News0 of 3 free this month
Markets

Ethereum enters its second decade after a year of upheaval at the foundation

Ethereum turns 11 after a year of leadership drama and institutional shifts. Adrian Boysel breaks down why the network’s future depends on dev culture rather than foundation politics.

Originally on CoinDesk
AB

Adrian Boysel

Contributor

Jul 30, 2026

5 min read

Photo illustration / STKR News

Ethereum just crossed its 11th year. In crypto terms, that makes it an ancient fossil, yet it somehow feels like it just entered its teenage years—erratic, undergoing a massive growth spurt, and fighting with its parents. The last twelve months have been a blur of high-level drama at the Ethereum Foundation, the sudden arrival of Wall Street money, and a technical pivot toward layer-2 solutions that has everyone arguing about fragmented liquidity.

For those of us building in this space, the noise from the Foundation can be a distraction. But this year was different. We saw key departures and internal restructuring that signaled a shift in how Ethereum manages itself. After a decade of being a somewhat loose collective of researchers and idealists, the gears are grinding as the network tries to balance its decentralized soul with the requirements of a global financial layer.

The Shakeup at the Foundation

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has always occupied a strange space. It isn’t a company, it isn’t a government, but it holds the keys to the kingdom’s research and grant-making. Over the past year, we’ve seen high-profile exits and whispers of cultural friction. To a founder, this looks like the classic growing pains of a startup that stayed a "family" for too long and suddenly realized they were running a trillion-dollar ecosystem.

The departures haven't just been about burnout. There is a fundamental tension between the old guard, who prioritize censorship resistance and deep research, and a newer wave that wants to move faster. When you see leadership shakeups in a decentralized project, it usually means the social layer is reaching a breaking point. For builders, this is a signal to stop relying on EF grants as a primary roadmap and start looking at how the private market is funding the actual tools we use every day.

The Institutional Reality Check

While the Foundation was busy navigating internal politics, the outside world finally knocked on the door. The launch of Ethereum ETFs marked the end of the "experimental" era. We are now officially an asset class. But here’s the skeptical take: institutional adoption is a double-edged sword. BlackRock doesn't care about your cypherpunk manifestos; they care about yield, compliance, and uptime.

This shift puts Ethereum in a weird spot. It has to remain permissionless enough to satisfy the base layer's security promises, but usable enough that a hedge fund in London won't get stuck in a gas-war during a market crash. The past year proved that Ethereum can handle the volume, but it also showed that the user experience is still nowhere near ready for the masses unless we hide the complexity under three layers of abstraction.

The Layer-2 Pivot and Fragmentation

We can’t talk about this past year without mentioning the transition to a rollup-centric roadmap. Vitalik and the researchers have doubled down on the idea that Ethereum’s mainnet is for settlement, and Layer-2s (L2s) are for users. This has solved the high-fee problem, but it created a new one: fragmentation. Every L2 is now its own little walled garden, fighting for the same builders and the same liquidity.

If you're building an app today, you aren't just "building on Ethereum." You're choosing between Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, or a dozen others. This creates a friction point that wasn't there five years ago. We’ve traded high gas fees for a fragmented user base. The challenge for the next decade isn't just scaling throughput; it’s making these disjointed islands talk to each other so the user doesn't have to know which bridge they’re crossing.

Why the Founder Perspective Matters More Now

As a founder, I look at Ethereum’s second decade and see a project that is finally losing its training wheels. The Foundation’s internal chaos is actually a sign of maturity—it means the core researchers aren’t the only ones who matter anymore. The center of gravity has shifted to the developers, the rollup providers, and the institutional integrators.

The skepticism comes in when we look at the roadmap. There is a lot of talk about "statelessness" and "Verkle trees," but very little talk about how to make onboarding easier for a non-crypto developer. We are still asking people to understand private keys and seed phrases in a world where every other piece of tech uses biometrics. If Ethereum wants to survive another ten years, it needs to stop obsessing over the plumbing and start caring about the interior design.

Moving Toward a Builder-First Ecosystem

The next phase of Ethereum won't be defined by the personalities at the Foundation. It will be defined by whether or not we can build things that people actually use without needing a degree in cryptography. The year of upheaval was a necessary purge of the old way of doing things. The Foundation is becoming a background entity, which is exactly what a decentralized protocol should want.

We are seeing the birth of a more pragmatic Ethereum. One that realizes it isn't just a world computer, but a global ledger that needs to be fast, cheap, and boring. The excitement of the early days is being replaced by the steady work of building infrastructure. For those of us in the trenches, the noise is just background static. The signal is that the network is still running, the blocks are still moving, and the code is still open.

The Takeaway for Builders

Ethereum is no longer a research project; it is infrastructure. Don't get caught up in the celebrity culture of the Foundation or the price action of the ETFs. The real opportunity in the next decade lies in solving the fragmentation caused by the L2 pivot. If you can build the layer that makes the complexity of the current ecosystem invisible, you’ll be the one winning in Year 20.

  • Leadership transitions at the EF are a sign of decentralization, not just dysfunction.
  • Institutional adoption forces a transition from "cool tech" to "stable infrastructure."
  • L2 fragmentation is the biggest hurdle for new builders to navigate.
  • Stop waiting for the Foundation to lead; the roadmap is now in the hands of the ecosystem.

The second decade won't be as flashy as the first one, but it will be where the actual value is created. We’re moving past the era of whitepapers and into the era of utility. It’s about time.


Read the original at CoinDesk →

The Brief

Stay Updated on Cutting-Edge Tech

A six-minute morning dispatch on the markets and the technology shaping them.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Write for STKR

Become a Contributor

Earn $STKR for published stories on markets, protocols, and culture.

  • Earn $STKR for every published piece
  • Editorial support from the STKR desk
  • Byline visibility across the network
  • First look at the upcoming creator program
Apply to Write

Keep reading

All stories

Comments

24 reader responses