Can the SEC and CFTC’s pro-crypto rules be overturned? Legal opinion

We have spent years watching the SEC and CFTC treat crypto like a nuisance rather than an industry. Recently, though, the tide has started to turn. We are seeing a flurry of what look like pro-crypto rules and softer stances. For founders, this feels like a long-awaited exhale. But before you start planning your next three years based on a few friendly memos, we need to look at how durable these changes actually are.

The Fragility of Agency Guidance

In the world of federal agencies, what is given can be taken away just as quickly. When an agency like the SEC issues a new rule or a specific piece of guidance, it is often tied to the current leadership's philosophy. Right now, there is a clear push to integrate digital assets into the existing financial framework rather than just suing them out of existence. But the "anti-crypto army" in Washington is not just a catchphrase; it represents a legitimate legal and political block that views these concessions as a mistake.

Builders need to understand that agency rules are not laws passed by Congress. They are interpretations. If a new administration or a new chairperson takes the seat, they can initiate a process to rescind or replace these rules. While the Administrative Procedure Act prevents them from doing this overnight without a valid reason, a change in political will is often enough to start the clock on a rollback.

The Courtroom as a Final Arbiter

Even if the agencies stay friendly, the courts might not. We are living in an era where the judiciary is increasingly skeptical of agency overreach. This is a double-edged sword for crypto. On one hand, it helps us when the SEC tries to claim everything is a security. On the other hand, if the SEC creates a special exemption or a new pathway for crypto, a legacy financial institution could sue, claiming the agency exceeded its authority to help a competitor.

The legal opinion circulating right now suggests that any pro-crypto rule is vulnerable to the same scrutiny as the anti-crypto ones. If a rule is found to be "arbitrary and capricious," it gets tossed. For a founder, this means the regulatory ground under your feet is still shifting, even if it looks like solid concrete today.

What This Means for the Founder Perspective

I talk to builders every day who are waiting for "regulatory clarity" to launch. The reality is that clarity is a moving target. If you build your entire business model on a specific SEC staff no-action letter or a narrow CFTC definition, you are taking a massive platform risk. You aren't just building on Ethereum or Solana; you are building on the whim of a mid-level regulator who might be gone in two years.

The smart move right now is not to chase the latest rule change, but to build for resilience. This means keeping your architecture as decentralized as possible and your compliance team as lean as possible. You want to be able to pivot if a rule gets overturned by a circuit court in six months.

The Political Pendulum

We have to acknowledge the elephant in the room: the upcoming elections and the shifting political landscape. Crypto has become a partisan football. When one side favors it, the other side often feels compelled to oppose it just on principle. This creates a cycle where rules are made and broken every four to eight years.

For those of us in the trenches, this is exhausting. But it also creates an opportunity for those who can navigate the gray area. The agencies are currently signaling that they want to play ball, likely because they have lost several high-profile court cases recently. They are trying to set the terms of engagement before the courts take even more power away from them. It is a defensive play, not necessarily a sign of a new heart.

Strategic Takeaways for Builders

• Don't treat guidance as gospel. A rule change is a signal, not a guarantee. Keep your legal counsel close and your burn rate low while these rules are tested in court.
• Watch the litigation, not just the legislation. The real rules of crypto are being written in the lawsuits against the agencies, not just the agency handbooks.
• Diversify your jurisdictional risk. If you can, maintain a presence or a structure that doesn't rely solely on a single U.S. agency's current mood.

The recent pro-crypto shifts at the SEC and CFTC are a step in the right direction, but they are far from a finished product. The legal machinery required to overturn these rules is already in motion, and the political opposition is waiting for their turn at the wheel. As builders, our job is to stay skeptical, stay agile, and keep building despite the noise. The technology will outlast the regulators, but only if we don't let their flip-flopping break our momentum.

The regulatory environment for crypto is currently a game of musical chairs. When the music stops, you want to make sure you have a seat that isn't dependent on a temporary rule.

We are seeing progress, yes. But in crypto, progress is often followed by a pivot. Stay focused on the product and the users. The legal battles will settle eventually, but until then, assume every pro-crypto rule has an expiration date.

Read the original at Cointelegraph →